carwebquestrubric

	Sign In Sign-Up

Scoring Rubric for Individual Arguments and Group Presentations

Back to auto safety Web quest home

Auto Safety Web Quest Below Standard (0) Standard (1) Above Standard (2)

Quality of Support Evidence 1) Insufficient information is gathered to support arguments. 2) Irrelevant information is gathered to support arguments. 3) No credit is given to source documents. Thorough and valid information is presented with credit given to the prepared links. Thorough, valid and persuasive evidence is given with proper citation of sources from prepared links and additional sources generated from appropriate key word searches.

Clarity 1) The intent of the arguments are unclear. 2) The tables/graphs are poorly organized or missing components. 3) The information provided does not support arguments 1) Arguments are well organized. 2) Tables/Graphs are easily read. 3) Information provided helps to support argument 1) Organization is neat and clearly read 2) Tables/Graphs are well organized and visually interesting. 3) Information presented provides convincing evidence of the author's position

Content 1) Important or relevant information is missing. 2) Presentation of information is false or misleading. A range of relevant information is presented in an organized and understandable way using the links provided. A wide range of relevant information is presented in a clear and convincing manner using the links provided as well as additional sites from key-word searches.

Work Ethic 1) Poor use of class time during discussion. 2) Poor use of listserv discussion. 3) Poor use of computer time. Disciplined thoughtful use of class time and computer time. Effective use of school time as well as clear evidence of extra-curricular time spent to prepare arguments.

Persuasion 1) Arguments are anecdotal. 2) Arguments do not address the assigned task. 3) Support data is absent or misleading 4) No sources are given for information provide. Provide information appropriate to the assigned task in a logical order to support arguments. Sources are provided for information. Arguments are well organized and presented logically with information from cited reputable sources.

Auto Safety Web Quest	Below Standard (0)	Standard (1)	Above Standard (2)
Quality of Support Evidence	1) Insufficient information is gathered to support arguments. 2) Irrelevant information is gathered to support arguments. 3) No credit is given to source documents.	Thorough and valid information is presented with credit given to the prepared links.	Thorough, valid and persuasive evidence is given with proper citation of sources from prepared links and additional sources generated from appropriate key word searches.
Clarity	1) The intent of the arguments are unclear. 2) The tables/graphs are poorly organized or missing components. 3) The information provided does not support arguments	1) Arguments are well organized. 2) Tables/Graphs are easily read. 3) Information provided helps to support argument	1) Organization is neat and clearly read 2) Tables/Graphs are well organized and visually interesting. 3) Information presented provides convincing evidence of the author's position
Content	1) Important or relevant information is missing. 2) Presentation of information is false or misleading.	A range of relevant information is presented in an organized and understandable way using the links provided.	A wide range of relevant information is presented in a clear and convincing manner using the links provided as well as additional sites from key-word searches.
Work Ethic	1) Poor use of class time during discussion. 2) Poor use of listserv discussion. 3) Poor use of computer time.	Disciplined thoughtful use of class time and computer time.	Effective use of school time as well as clear evidence of extra-curricular time spent to prepare arguments.
Persuasion	1) Arguments are anecdotal. 2) Arguments do not address the assigned task. 3) Support data is absent or misleading 4) No sources are given for information provide.	Provide information appropriate to the assigned task in a logical order to support arguments. Sources are provided for information.	Arguments are well organized and presented logically with information from cited reputable sources.